When Specific Eviction Cases Override Winter Truce Protections

France's "Trêve Hivernale," or winter truce, is a powerful shield against eviction for many tenants. From November 1st to March 31st, it generally halts the physical execution of eviction orders, even when a judge has ruled definitively. But what happens when the situation is far more complex than simple unpaid rent? When does the law allow for specific eviction cases to proceed, even during these protected months? This guide dives deep into these specific scenarios, including the critical distinctions for Cas Spécifiques d'Expulsion (Trêve Hivernale, Squatters, Expulsions Abusives), helping both property owners and occupants understand the nuanced legal landscape.

At a Glance: Key Takeaways

  • The Winter Truce (November 1st - March 31st) typically suspends eviction enforcement in France to protect occupants during cold weather.
  • However, several specific, narrowly defined exceptions allow for immediate eviction, even during the truce.
  • These exceptions primarily involve illegal occupation (squatting), safety concerns (domestic violence, dangerous buildings), and refusal of suitable relocation offers.
  • A judge's order, usually from the Judge of Execution (JEX), is almost always required to enforce an exception during the truce.
  • Property owners can still pursue legal proceedings during the truce; only the physical act of removal is suspended.
  • Navigating these exceptions is complex and requires solid evidence and legal expertise.

The Winter Truce: A Shield, But Not Absolute

Imagine a severe winter, families facing eviction into the cold. This humanitarian concern is precisely why France established the "Trêve Hivernale." This legal provision automatically suspends the physical enforcement of eviction orders for principal and secondary residences from November 1st to March 31st each year. It's a fundamental protection, designed to prevent people from being put out on the street during the harshest months.
For property owners, however, this benevolent protection often comes with significant financial strain. Five months of unpaid rent, ongoing charges, potential property damage, and the inability to re-let the property can create a critical burden. This is where the intricacies of French law come into play, acknowledging that some situations demand an immediate response, overriding even the compelling need for winter protection. Article L. 412-6 of the Code des procédures civiles d'exécution outlines these crucial exceptions.

Unpacking the Exceptions: When Eviction Can Proceed

The law is clear: while the winter truce is a strong safeguard, it's not an impenetrable shield. There are specific, strictly interpreted circumstances where a judge can authorize an eviction even during this period. Understanding these can make all the difference.

1. The Squatter Dilemma: Illegal Occupation

This is perhaps one of the most misunderstood areas. The winter truce offers no protection to those who occupy a property illegally, without any right or title. This isn't about a tenant who's fallen on hard times; it's about a complete absence of legal grounds for being there in the first place.
Who Qualifies as an Illegal Occupant (Squatter)?
The definition is specific: individuals who have gained entry by "manœuvre, menace ou voie de fait" (maneuver, threat, or force). This covers a range of scenarios:

  • "Pure" Squatters: People who forcibly enter and occupy an empty property. This is a criminal offense (violation de domicile).
  • Expired Seasonal Tenants: Individuals whose seasonal lease or professional mobility lease has definitively ended and wasn't renewed, yet they refuse to leave.
  • Guests Who Overstay: People who were initially hosted for free but subsequently refuse to vacate the premises.
  • Unauthorized Sub-tenants: Those occupying a property without the primary landlord's permission, especially if the main lease explicitly forbids sub-letting.
    Crucial Distinction: A Renter is Not a Squatter
    It's vital to grasp this point: a tenant who once had a valid lease but remains in the property after their lease has ended is generally not considered a squatter. They had an initial right of occupancy. Therefore, such a former tenant does benefit from the winter truce, even if an eviction order has been issued against them. The squatter exception only applies to those who never had a valid legal right to occupy the premises, or whose right was extremely limited and clearly defined (like a seasonal rental expiring).
    Accelerated Procedure for Squatted Primary Residences
    If your primary residence is illegally occupied (squatted), French law offers a quicker path to eviction. You must:
  1. File a Police Report: Lodge a complaint for violation of domicile.
  2. Prove Ownership: Provide evidence of your property rights.
  3. Official Constat: Have a judicial police officer confirm the illegal occupation.
    Once these steps are met, the Prefect (local government authority) can formally order the occupants to leave. If they don't comply, the Prefect can then order their forced evacuation, often without needing a separate court decision and, critically, without waiting for the end of the winter truce.
    For other types of properties (e.g., secondary residences, commercial properties) that are squatted, a court decision is necessary, but the winter truce will still not be an obstacle to execution once that decision is obtained.

2. When Safety Demands Action: Domestic Violence & Judicial Orders

The law prioritizes the safety of individuals, and in certain sensitive situations, this overrides the winter truce.

  • Domestic Violence: If a protective order is issued by a judge (often the family affairs judge) requiring the immediate eviction of a violent spouse or partner from the family home, the winter truce offers no protection to the perpetrator. The victim's safety is paramount, and the eviction can proceed without delay.
  • Specific Family Court Decisions: Beyond violence, other specific judicial decisions related to family matters can also bypass the truce. For instance, if a judge, during a divorce proceeding, issues an order of non-conciliation and explicitly assigns the marital home to one spouse, that spouse has the right to occupy it immediately, even if the other spouse refuses to leave during the winter period.

3. Imminent Danger: Unsafe or Unsanitary Buildings

When a building poses an immediate threat to the physical safety or health of its occupants or the public, the winter truce is suspended. This applies to properties subject to:

  • Péril Orders: A prefectural decree declaring a building to be in danger of collapse.
  • Insalubrité Orders: A decree finding the property to be dangerously unsanitary (e.g., severe mold, lack of basic facilities, structural issues causing health risks).
  • Mise en Sécurité Orders: Any official order to secure a building due to significant risks (e.g., dangerous electrical installations, gas leaks, extreme structural defects).
    In these cases, the safety of the occupants justifies an immediate evacuation, sometimes even without a prior court decision, though official notification and orders from the prefecture or mayor's office are always required. It's important to note that the authorities (prefecture or city hall) are typically obligated to offer emergency rehousing or accommodation solutions to the evacuated occupants in such situations.

4. Refusing a Helping Hand: Declined Relocation Offers

This exception applies when an occupant, subject to an eviction order, has been offered a suitable relocation solution but refuses it or fails to meet its terms. For an offer to be considered "adapted," it must meet several criteria:

  • Family Needs: Appropriate surface area and number of rooms for the household's composition.
  • Geographic Proximity: Located in an area that allows the occupants to maintain their social, professional, and familial ties (e.g., children's schools, access to work).
  • Financial Affordability: A rent that is proportionate to the occupant's financial capacity.
    If such a genuinely adapted offer is made and the occupant unreasonably refuses it, or accepts it but then breaches the new lease agreement (e.g., by not paying the new rent), the eviction from the original property can proceed even during the winter truce. This demonstrates a balance between protecting vulnerable individuals and ensuring that reasonable assistance is not exploited.

5. Beyond the Truce: Specific Temporary Accommodations

Not all living situations benefit from the winter truce. Certain types of temporary or specific-status accommodations are explicitly excluded:

  • CROUS University Residences: If a student no longer meets the eligibility criteria (e.g., no longer enrolled), they can be evicted.
  • CADA (Centres d'Accueil pour Demandeurs d'Asile): Asylum seekers who have had their applications rejected (déboutés) can be asked to leave.
  • RHVS (Résidences Hôtelières à Vocation Sociale): Socially oriented hotel residences, designed for very short-term emergency accommodation.
  • Foyers de Jeunes Travailleurs (Young Workers' Hostels): Temporary housing for young professionals.
  • Emergency Accommodation: Shelter provided on an urgent, temporary basis.
  • Tourist Rentals: Short-term furnished rentals (like Airbnb or seasonal rentals of less than 90 days).
    Important Note: A standard furnished lease for one year (renewable) does benefit from the winter truce. The exceptions above relate to highly specific, temporary, or condition-dependent housing arrangements.

6. The Empty Home Conundrum: Prolonged Inoccupation

If a property subject to an eviction order is demonstrably and prolongedly unoccupied, meaning it no longer serves as an effective primary residence for the tenants, a judge can authorize the eviction during the truce. This prevents a property from being held vacant under the guise of winter protection when no one is actually living there. Proving "prolonged inoccupation" typically requires strong evidence, such as multiple bailiff's reports, utility consumption records, or neighbor testimonies.

Navigating the Courts: Invoking an Exception

For most of these exceptions (with the specific exception of squatting a primary residence or a perilous building order), you cannot simply decide an exception applies and proceed. A judicial process is mandatory. You must petition the Judge of Execution (JEX), typically through an accelerated "référé d'heure à heure" or "référé" procedure before the Judicial Court where the property is located.
Here’s what that process generally looks like:

  1. File the Référé Request: As the property owner, you'll need to submit a formal request to the JEX. This request must be meticulously documented. You'll attach strong evidence proving the exception you're invoking – this might include the new lease offer the tenant refused, a prefectural order declaring the property unsafe, or a bailiff's report confirming illegal occupation by squatters. You'll also need the definitive eviction judgment and the "commandement de quitter les lieux" (order to vacate) that was served by the bailiff.
  2. The Référé Hearing: Usually scheduled 10 to 20 days after your request is filed, this hearing allows both parties to present their arguments and evidence. It's a swift, emergency procedure designed to resolve urgent matters.
  3. The Judge's Order: If the judge finds that the exception is clearly met and the evidence is compelling, they will issue an order authorizing the eviction to proceed during the winter truce. This entire process, from filing to order, typically takes 1 to 2 months.
    Costs Involved:
    Be prepared for legal fees. Engaging an attorney and a bailiff for this specific procedure can range from approximately 1,450 to 2,500 euros. Before proceeding, it's wise to conduct a cost-benefit analysis. Is the cost of the legal procedure likely to be less than the amount of rent you would lose by waiting until April 1st?

What Owners Can Do While the Truce is Active

Even if an exception isn't applicable or hasn't yet been authorized by a judge, the winter truce doesn't completely halt all legal actions. It only suspends the physical act of eviction by the bailiff and law enforcement.
During the truce, property owners can and should continue with the legal steps:

  • Initiate or Continue Legal Proceedings: You can still sue for unpaid rent or for the termination of the lease.
  • Obtain an Eviction Judgment: You can secure a definitive court order for eviction.
  • Serve the "Commandement de Quitter les Lieux": The bailiff can still deliver the formal notice to vacate.
  • Prepare for April 1st: Get all necessary paperwork and permissions in order so that the physical eviction can be executed immediately once the truce lifts on April 1st.
    Essentially, the legal clock keeps ticking; only the final, physical removal is paused.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid: Don't Trip Up!

Navigating eviction law, especially during the winter truce, is fraught with complexities. Making a misstep can lead to significant delays, added costs, or even legal repercussions.

  • Confusing Grace Periods with the Winter Truce: A judge might grant an occupant a "délai de grâce" (period of grace) to find new housing, typically ranging from a few months up to three years. These grace periods are separate from the winter truce and must be respected. The truce doesn't override or extend a judge's granted grace period.
  • Attempting Self-Help Eviction: Never, under any circumstances, attempt to evict someone yourself, even if you firmly believe an exception applies. Changing locks, cutting utilities, or removing belongings without a court order is illegal and can lead to criminal charges (up to three years in prison and a 30,000 euro fine). A bailiff will refuse to act without an explicit judicial order authorizing the exception.
  • Invoking Personal Hardship as an Exception: Your personal financial difficulties, your need to recover the property for your own use, or other personal circumstances, while understandable, are generally not recognized as legal exceptions to the winter truce. The law's protections are for the occupant, not the owner's convenience.
  • Neglecting Proof for Relocation: If you're trying to invoke the "relocation offer refused" exception, flimsy evidence won't cut it. You need concrete, material proof: a signed lease for the new adapted accommodation, formal communication from the new landlord, and clear evidence of the current occupant's refusal or breach.

Deciding When to Act: Is an Exception Right for You?

Considering the legal complexities and costs, how do you know if pursuing an exception during the winter truce is the right path for your situation?
It's generally advisable to invoke an exception if:

  • You Possess Solid, Documented Evidence: Your case aligns perfectly with one of the legal exceptions, and you have undeniable proof (bailiff's reports, official decrees, protective orders, new lease agreements).
  • The Cost-Benefit Analysis is Favorable: The anticipated cost of the judicial procedure (lawyer, bailiff fees) is significantly less than the potential financial losses (unpaid rent, damages) incurred by waiting out the entire winter truce period.
  • The Situation Clearly Fits a Legal Exception: There's no ambiguity; your case squarely falls into one of the narrowly defined legal exceptions.
    Conversely, if your evidence is weak, the cost of the procedure outweighs the lost rent, or your situation doesn't clearly match a legal exception, it's often more pragmatic to prepare for the eviction to proceed promptly on April 1st.
    Always Consult Legal Counsel: Given the highly technical and nuanced nature of these laws, a consultation with a specialized lawyer in real estate and eviction law is not just recommended, it's essential. They can assess your specific situation, review your evidence, and advise on the most effective and legally compliant course of action.

Proactive Planning: Strategies to Mitigate Risk

While no one wishes for an eviction scenario, property owners can adopt proactive strategies to minimize risks and navigate potential challenges more effectively, especially concerning the winter truce.

  • Plan Your Eviction Procedures Early: Don't wait until November 1st to begin legal proceedings if an issue arises. Initiate judicial action for unpaid rent or lease termination as soon as grounds appear. The earlier you start, the greater the chance of obtaining a definitive eviction judgment and even executing the eviction before the winter truce begins.
  • Document Everything Thoroughly: Maintain meticulous records of tenant behavior. This includes bailiff's reports for damages or disturbances, dated photographs, certified mail correspondence, and neighbor testimonies. Such documentation can be crucial in building a case for an arrêté de péril or insalubrité if conditions deteriorate, or simply strengthening a standard eviction case.
  • Monitor Social Housing Applications: If your tenant has applied for social housing, stay in contact with municipal housing services (where permissible) or your bailiff. If a suitable social housing offer is made to the tenant, you might be able to invoke the "relocation offer refused" exception if they decline it, potentially expediting the process.

Seeking Expert Guidance for Your Unique Situation

French eviction law, particularly around the winter truce and its exceptions, is intricate and unforgiving of missteps. While this guide provides a comprehensive overview of Cas Spécifiques d'Expulsion (Trêve Hivernale, Squatters, Expulsions Abusives), every situation carries its unique set of facts and challenges.
Whether you're a property owner struggling with an occupant who fits one of these exceptions, or an individual trying to understand your rights, the complexity demands professional attention. Don't hesitate to seek out a specialized lawyer (avocat) or a bailiff (huissier de justice) who can offer tailored advice and guide you through the process, ensuring compliance with the law and protecting your interests. Sometimes, understanding the law can empower you to help prevent a crisis, or better yet, avoid one entirely. Just ask for Her story of being expelled, a testament to the emotional and legal turmoil these situations can create.